Subject: Council & Onyx: In partnership already?
Did you get the glossy brochure that some residents were sent recently? I was struck by Onyx's use of the councils corporate logo on the front. To me it spoke of the council's collusion to develop a foeregone conclusion - the reality of a recycling depot in Hollingdean Lane.
I called the council on 01273 290000 and asked for their complaints department. I had to talk to a man who asked me to clarify my complaint - I said that I objected to the council putting their stamp of appproval ie use of the Logo in a private company's unpopular plans - even though it has yet to go before the counciils sub planning committee. This to me smacks of unfair council involvement in this. The gentlman with whom I spoke from the complaints department asked me of my preferred outcome to my complaint to which I replied " that the recycling plant is not built or that the person who allowed the Council's Logo to be used is subject to disciplinary procedure" He indicated to me that everyone should be compaining about this and he would be willing to deal with each complaint. Thus I am writing to you in the hope that you will know how to spread the word about raising the profile of this miserable project within the council istself.

All the very best regards

Mr S.

Subject: Re - What is your answer?
Firstly let me say that I agree the general points you make in your letter about the size and unsightliness of much of Brighton and Hove's waste. We have been avid recyclers and composters for years and like everyone involved in the above campaign endeavour to keep our waste tidy.
It must, however, be pointed out that the DUMP THE DUMP campaign is in no way related to the wheelie bin issue, though it is indeed related to the proposal for an incinerator in Newhaven.
The issue about proposing a waste transfer unit and materials recovery facility to handle all domestic waste for Brighton and Hove and part of Lewes in the heart of a residential area and close to four schools is one of appropriate location. And before I hear the charge of NIMBYism (a silly term at the best of times), let me re-iterate this is an issue of appropriate location. You ask us what our alternative is. Well in terms of a single site proposal there are several, Hollingbury Industrial Estate, Hangleton Bottom etc, all more appropriate than Hollingdean Lane. We do not identify a single site for two reasons. Firstly Councillors are divided as to which of several they would prefer and because, as in fact this indicates, the alternatives have not been fully explored and assessed. There is of course another alternative which is the most environmentally friendly. That is the use of a series of smaller operations throughout Brighton, Hove and Lewes with a greater use of small electric vehicles. Of course this option is unlikely to appeal to the profit interest of a commercial company like Onyx.
Yours sincerely,

Mr G

Subject: What is your answer?

Dear Sir/Madam
                              Let me be honest with you from the start I do not live within your area, And I do drive a refuse truck from the Hollingdean depot I do however only live a couple of miles away.
But regardless of where I live the facts are these, at the rate people are throwing out rubbish the two to three year life of the two landfill sights used by Brighton and Hove will be shortened, then what.
For Twenty years or so scientists have been warning of global warming followed by very severe climate change it has apparently fallen on deaf ears. For Ten years the council and the local papers have been urging us to recycle again the pleas have run up against the great British wall (let someone else do it  and  why should I,  I pay my council tax). The council have been trying to get an incinerator built but guess what, yes you have got it...
more protest, and now the council have been forced into the situation whereby asking people to cut down on what they throw away and to recycle more is no longer an option. The council has over the past year or so been introducing wheelie bins that now force people to recycle more and while 99% are using them quite happily  a small minority still want to protest, just cast your eyes up the road to Preston when their anti campaign hit some national papers they became a laughing stock from the vast majority of the country that has had wheelie`s for years, and for what, basically because they have been asked to be more responsible for the rubbish they themselves create.
Now I have to ask you the question, What is your answer to the problem that is about to knock on our door.
I have lived in Brighton for 64 years and have been sickened like most people at the piles of rubbish and rusty old overflowing bins all over this city, but now thanks to the courage of two women introducing the new bins parts of our city are being transformed, the new transfer station is a part of the bigger picture to make Brighton a place to be proud of.
Everyone has the right to protest but make sure you have a better idea and not just the old not on my doorstep thank you, And finally it is our duty to hand this planet over to the future generations in the best possible condition, and not as some desolate planet covered in ice

Mr A

Dump the Dump replies to the above:

Dear Mr A,
Thank you very much for taking the time to writing this email. Your opinion is greatly appreciated.

The impact the HGV traffic has on our community is extreme. You can see from the website ‘caught on camera’ how much traffic comes out of the Depot. It is absolutely devastating; it feels like we are living in the middle of a motorway.

We are all responsible for our waste, I absolutely agree with you: people do not take responsibility for their waste. Consume and don’t worry about the consequences. Manufacturers aren’t making our lives easy. Go to the supermarkets it is unbelievable how much packaging I have to take home.
I think the whole attitude of consuming has to change.

Hollingdean was chosen because as it is earmarked for regeneration, the analysis of Onyx documentation shows quite clearly that areas were identified on basic criteria where do manual workers live? In Hollingdean nobody will stand up and protest against this development, because they will not be able to read reports. Well quite frankly, I live in Hollingdean, and have a degree, and there are plenty of manual workers who can read and understand perfectly well. I think that it is patronising to make such assumptions.

The impact on the community of such a large development is unforeseen, but will be detrimental. Onyx will want to make money that is what they do internationally and globally. It is called over-intensification. Just too much in one area.

My daughter is nearly 3 and supposed to go to the Downs Infants School and will be 15 meters away from lorries manoeuvring, unloading all day. She should not have to breathe in air that is so polluted that the area has been declared an Air Quality Management Area before development has even begun. You would not want this to happen to your grandchildren.

Walking to school, there is a thick curtain of fumes in the air it is awful. That is not because of a few HGV’s that are bringing waste to the depot that is because the fleet is being increased - bringing all of Brighton and Hove’s waste. In a residential area, that is just too much.

I would have liked to talk to the council about this waste management, but the consultation was kept very quiet, we all know why, opinions make things harder. A democracy should offer a public consultation.

Subject: Joint Letters from Onyx / Brighton & Hove City Council, sent
29/04/05

"Thank you for your letter of 29th April to residents in the Hollingdean
area of Brighton. I am protesting vehemently against the proposed Waste Transfer Site on the grounds of its size and impact on our community. In particular, I am protesting against the increase in traffic (I believe your letter
understates the case). I am also protesting about the very negative effect
this inappropriate development would have on the health of the children and
teachers at Downs Infant and Junior Schools - and indeed, the health of those of us who live nearby.
I am alarmed to note that your letter of 29th April is a joint letter from Brighton and Hove City Council AND Onyx (GLS). It makes me fear that this is a 'done deal' and that local opinion will stand for nothing; I'm sure you will want to put my mind at rest on this matter.
Yours sincerely
Mr B

Subject: Traffic & Norman Baker

Great campaign. Read the literature and visited the web site. Just a couple of thoughts that may be of help to you.

Traffic congestion has already risen in and around the Vogue Gyratory due to a council public transport initiative- bringing out the bus stop south of Covers (opposite the old church) to take up the whole of the southbound lane of Lewes Road is both disruptive and dangerous to motorists, passengers, cyclists and pedestrians.
It beggars belief that this work would have been under taken in the full knowledge that hundreds of heavy vehicles were soon to be operating through there. Even if these lorries were to leave the depot and turn left into Lewes Road the Hollingdean Road has no real left turn lane until the bottom. You could predict stand still back to Ditchling Road during the school run at the very least.

One of the main opponents to the Albion's bid for Falmer was Norman Baker, MP for Lewes. His reason, although this would have to be verified, was that the site was not in Brighton but in Lewes. It was interesting to read your fact sheet stating that some of the recyclates and black bags were to come from the western part of his constituency. Given his famed penchant for shouting about fair play, maybe he could be asked for an opinion. As I stated earlier his opposition to the stadium would have to be checked out, but if my memory is correct it would be an interesting debating tool.

Thankyou for taking the time to read the above. I'm sorry if it is not a lot of help.

Kick up a stink !

Yours faithfully

Mr A

Subject: Planning Inspector Recommendations


Dear Dumpthe Dump
I wondered why you had not mentioned the fact that at the Waste management
Contract joing Committee meeting of East Sussex and Brighton and Hove
councils the Planning Inspectors recommended that certain issues, particualry the condideration of other sites for allocation in the pLn are included in a review of the plan. He does reccommend that the Hollingdean site be retained but that a wider range of sites ought also to be identified in the plan.
Ms E

Subject: Roedale Rd ratrun

Dear Mr Holloway,
I understand you are the person to contact about the inappropriate use of a route by City Clean vehicles. There have been several daily coming left at Ditchling rd [ fiveways traffic lights] and then left down into hollinbury dip, where there is a sign with a lorry crossed across it- which i presume means that HGVs are not meant to use the route to pass through.
Today I happened to follow a vehicle at 1.10pm from the by-pass all along ditchling rd and dowwn through the and then it turned right after the parade of shops down Roedale rd and went into the City clean yard at the end.
This really can't go on. The council has a resonsibility not to make our residential streets a rat run for the rubbish collection vehicles. There are very many of them - and i understand that they will be continueing to increase in number until at least August. There is no crossing at the Dip for school children coming out of Hertford Schhols- or anybody using the shops on both sides of the road. The exhaust pollution from the vehicles is extreme- and diesal- the worst sort. Please can you take action to prohibit the cityclean vehicles from coming down into Hollingbury Dip and onto the site via Roedale Rd. Please can you let me know what is possible - many thanks,
Ms D

Visit the support archives here for loads more comments and suggestions

 

This website is a forum for concerned parents and local residents who oppose the proposed waste and recycling dump at Hollingdean Lane. We are in no way associated with Onyx, the Council or any other group or organisation. All e-mails sent to the website may be published unless stated. All contents © Refuse-Refuse 2005